Clear the stage for light
– or isn’t all fine art at least also about light anyway? Especially in painting? Wolfgang Schöne wrote the standard work “On Light in Painting” many years ago, and one could certainly draw such a conclusion from it. Only: painters have to take detours. Color is matter that is also perceived as light. But it is not light, it only represents light. And color is not a property of objects (such as shape), but only the reflection of light of certain wavelengths, depending on the surface texture.
An exception are the glass painters, who, already in the Middle Ages, used light as a means for the diaphaneity of their church windows, not without theological meaning, but also with great effect. In the 1960s, after a prelude, for example, by Moholy-Nagy (“Light-Space Modulator”) in the twenties, the “indirect”, the detour working with light came to an end: artists worked directly with the medium of light – Julio Le Parc, Heinz Mack, Günther Ücker, Dan Flavin, to name just a few names. Since then, “physical” light has become a self-evident art medium, whether as a sole subject or as an agent included in an overarching pictorial function, as in Jeff Wall’s backlit Cibachromes.
JoJo Tillmann works with light in similar contexts. His light objects, however, are not constructed like backlit advertising images, but rather in various layers of C-prints, foils, and acrylic glass, held together with aluminum frames. Their boxiness, the step into spatiality that becomes thematic here, brings out the object character. In this way, the light active there in the work of art, which comes from a fluorescent tube light source –